Skip to content
All work

UNi4 Online

Brand aggregation

Multiple education brands, one platform

Role
Visual Team Lead & UX Designer
Client
UNi4 Online
Period
May 2021 to Aug 2024
Team
Junior designers, learning designers, PM

The challenge

How do several education brands share one platform without losing what makes each of them distinct?

What it turned out to be

Unified navigation and shared patterns, with brand identity preserved at the point it matters.

Two problems arrived together. The design team was working in isolation, and several education brands needed to live on one platform.

They turned out to be versions of the same problem. Designers without shared visibility produce inconsistent work, and brands without shared patterns produce a platform people have to relearn on every hop.

Two tracks

Team and platform, run in parallel

Track 01 · As Team Leader

Designers working in isolation

Output quality was inconsistent and KPIs were being missed.
  • No shared visibility across projects
  • Introduced regular check-ins, shared workflows, and Kanban-based tracking
  • Output went up and KPIs were met consistently

Track 02 · Platform design

Several brands, one platform

Users needed to move between brands without losing context.
  • Designed a unified information architecture
  • Balanced brand identity against platform consistency
  • Delivered one platform carrying all the brands

The platform

Shared where it helps, distinct where it matters

Navigation, patterns and content structure are shared. Brand identity stays where a prospective student is choosing between institutions.

BEFORE · FOUR SITES, FOUR NAVIGATIONSA user moving between brands starts over each time.AFTER · ONE PLATFORM, BRANDS INTACTShared navigation and patterns.Brand identity kept where it carries meaning.
Four separate sites becoming one platform without dissolving the brands

Process

What I did

  1. 01

    Team process audit

    Looked at existing workflows and talked to each designer about friction and morale. Nobody could see what anyone else was doing.

  2. 02

    Kanban implementation

    A shared board, weekly check-ins and clear task ownership. Output improved and missed deadlines dropped.

  3. 03

    Competitor analysis

    Studied multi-brand education aggregators globally for navigation patterns and IA approaches to consolidating distinct brands.

  4. 04

    Information architecture

    Designed the IA for cross-brand navigation with each brand's identity intact, on unified patterns built to flex.

  5. 05

    Platform design

    Delivered the aggregator design. Stakeholders across all brands reviewed and signed off.

The process change did more for output quality than any design decision I made that year.

Findings

What surfaced across both tracks

Insights

  1. 01

    Designers needed clearer project visibility

  2. 02

    Regular check-ins improved team morale

  3. 03

    Users needed to move between brands without losing context

  4. 04

    Content consistency was what built trust across multiple educational brands

Outcome

Output went up, KPIs were met consistently, and stakeholders across the brands signed off on the platform.

Reflection

What I took from it

  • 01

    Most of leading the team was balancing what individuals needed against what the team had to deliver

  • 02

    A process change moved output more than any design change did

  • 03

    Platforms need flexibility for multi-brand contexts under one roof

Production site

The aggregator platform, live.

Open UNi4 Online